Wednesday, August 24, 2011

For the record

Tonight I finally snapped. I lost my temper at the radio.

You know what? I don't care if your opinion is different from mine, but have the decency to be honest about your motives, and the simple common courtesy to allow others the freedom to make their own.

The way I see it, there are three answers people give in relation to whether gay marriage should be legalised.

1 - Sure, why the hell not?
2 - I don't care what they do, but do they have to call it marriage?
3 - No. Marriage is between a man and a woman.

Number 1 is answered by 90% of Gen Y, and a growing number of Aussies. Even the liberals oppose a "Nanny state" declaring that if it doesn't hurt anyone else you should have the right to make your own choices (irony?).

For anyone in category 2, this is why: because it's about equality. Having the right to make the same choices as straight couples. If you can make the choice for yourself whether or not to marry, why shouldn't gay people be entitled to the same basic freedom?

Now this is when my blood starts to boil. When people say a 'traditional' marriage is between a man and a woman and should remain so. Why? Because like it or not, Australia was founded on Christian principals and our government doesn't have the balls to declare enough is enough.

If you believe that homosexuality is a sin, and in legalising marriage we are sinning, say so, and say it proudly. Don't hide your beliefs behind 'traditional values' and 'family ideals'. Have the guts to stand for what you believe in.

Tonight a Christian male called up the radio to discuss his views. He said that he'd been thinking a lot about marriage and what it meant because he was getting married in two weeks. He believed marriage was both a union between Christ and the church and a union between a man and a woman and placing God's covering over their relationship.

The journalist asked the man if he felt if gay marriage was legalised it would remove God's covering from his marriage.

'Of course not.'

So what's the problem?

I know a few gay couples, and none who would request the covering of God over their mariage anyway, so that's okay, the Christians can keep that.

James and I have made the decision to remain un-married until gay marriage is legalised. Why should we have rights denied to our friends? How can we be expected to raise our children with values of equality and acceptance when we continue to behave like homophobic rednecks?

It's time to grow up, Australia. And you don't like gay marriage, great. Don't get gay married.


  1. Sorry let me elaborate most ppl against it don't understand let alone have felt real love.

  2. Hey Lucy,
    Your absolutely right, I'm straight but I certainly have no desire to have god cover my relationship, yet I have the right to get married and my two friends who are lesbians who want to get married and have children aren't allowed. It makes me sick to think that we live in a world that denies people their rights based on their sexuality, especially when it makes absolutely no difference to their lives. Any politician who follows policies built on hate has some serious explaining to do.

  3. times have used to be decidedly uncool to get married...people chose to "live in sin". I guess the young more businesslike these days

  4. should same sex unions really be called marriages????(except in the figurative sense)
    same sex unions have been around for thousands of years with various degrees of legality (re inheritance and responsibilities)The word for marriage has been around for thousands of years too. It seems that it is only in recent times that people wish to call same sex unions 'marriages'. In these modern times we have holocaust denial and also etymology denial...that is not believing in the accepted usage of a word for thousands of years in many cultures....why not coin a new word for a union of a same sex couple rather than destroying the usage of the term marriage?)

  5. !.semites are those who speak semitic languages. the majority of people who speak semitic languages are the arabs. many arabs are anti jewish or anti zionist. should their hatred of jews or zionists really be called anti-semitism or should a new expression be coined??? (because obviously the term "anti semitism" equally means anti arab)

    2.some people may be scared of homosexuals and maybe could be called homophobic (phobic about or scared of man) Some people just hate homosexuals and persecute and attack them. Is the term homophobic really an appropriate descriptive expression for that? Perhaps a new term should be coined?

    3. There is an expression for men who hate women...mysogynist. Why is not there a special word for women who hate men???...perhaps a new term should be coined?
    TO BE CONT...?